When trying to prove security of asymmetric signature, for instance for existential (or strong) unforgeability against chosen messages attack, do we need to consider the signer as a possible adversary?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
No, the signer is per definition in possession of the secret signing key and thus can always produce signatures for any message of his choice.
Consequently, a notion of unforgeability is not meaningful with respect to the signer. For a signature scheme one requires unforgeability for parties who are not in possession of the secret signing key but only the public verification key.
You may also look at this answer for a more detailed discussion on attacks and attack models for digital signature schemes.