Sign up ×
Cryptography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for software developers, mathematicians and others interested in cryptography. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Computerized cryptanalysis has obviously made formerly "secure" hand ciphers like Playfair, Four Square, and the Hill Cipher obsolete because they can be defeated in seconds. But is there a hand cipher where a modern computer attack does not have an advantage over a cryptanalysis done by hand? There are certainly tasks that are more quickly done by humans, rather than computers. I'm wondering if there is a hand cipher that takes advantage of this.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by CodesInChaos, e-sushi, Nemo, D.W., B-Con Oct 23 '13 at 19:32

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Duplicate of (see also – D.W. May 19 '13 at 3:10
@D.W. Do you know that there is a close-link where you can formally mark a question as a duplicate? (Just below the tag line.) – Paŭlo Ebermann May 20 '13 at 10:40
Thanks, @PaŭloEbermann. Yes, I'm aware of it. (For reasons that probably aren't relevant to anyone else, it doesn't work for me: on my primary platform, something on my browser's configuration makes the "close" link not work. Maybe an ad blocker or something, I've never taken the time to fully trouble shoot it. My apologies for cluttering things up with comments as a result.) – D.W. May 20 '13 at 16:19
@D.W. Almost certainly an ad blocker. I have to disable my "privoxy" to get the StackExchange "close" etc. links to work. – Nemo Oct 23 '13 at 18:53

2 Answers 2

One time pad is definitely both easy to do and has perfect secrecy, but key management is a pain and can compromise security. Basically a Vigenère cipher with a key as long as the the message should be secure, because different keys can create ALL possible messages with equal probabilities.

Again, it's a one time pad, so no KPA, CPA, or CCA security. Actually I don't think any pen & paper cipher system has such security.

share|improve this answer
Isn't a Vigenere cipher with a key as long as the plaintext basically a one-time pad? – rath May 20 '13 at 9:33
@rath: Not necessarily! The selection process for the key is what matters. If you use English (or whatever language) text, a standard Vigenere cipher technique, then the biased frequencies in the key let a cryptanalyst potentially break your ciphertext. But if your key's letters are from a uniformly random distribution, then it is pretty much the same thing. – Reid May 20 '13 at 13:26
@Luke Sheppard: Just curious , what would be your motivation for wanting a hand-generated cipher in the first place? The only scenario I can think of would be in prisons, where gangs usually communicate to their fellow gang-bangers by some kind of handwritten code. – William Hird Jun 3 '13 at 22:58
@WilliamHird A scenario would be a journalist investigating abuses in a totalitarian state. Journalist generates a series of one-time pads (literal pads) and keeps a photocopy/scan of them in a secure bank vault in their democratic home country. While taking interview notes and other observations in the totalitarian state, each note is encrypted with a one-time pad which is then burned. Once the journalist gets home, they can decrypt their notes. You'd probably also want physical hiding techniques for the pads and the encrypted notes. – LateralFractal Oct 18 '13 at 0:29

The solitaire cipher is pretty good. The number of ways to shuffle the card pack is 2.3 e71. This is a huge number of possibilities that even a computer couldn't check through...

share|improve this answer
It would be nice if somebody showed how you can create a nice scientific format using TeX here by editing the answer. – Maarten Bodewes Aug 15 at 11:18

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.