# Winternitz One-Time Signature

I am reading the page 38 in this "Post Quantum Cryptography" book (Equations 8 and 9). My question is, why to compute the verification key $Y$, $f$ is applied $2^w-1$ times? Are there any security notions involved?

-

$w$ is a parameter that can be freely chosen, to maximize performance. Each element of the signature encodes $w$ bits of the message to be signed, so the larger $w$ is, the fewer elements you need to include in the signature.

If you make $w$ large, then signatures can be shorter; however, the tradeoff is that key generation, signing, and verification run slower. If you make $w$ small, then signatures are longer; however, key generation, signing, and verification run faster. So this is a tradeoff between the size of the signatures vs the running time of the scheme. You can choose $w$ to provide the best tradeoff for your application. The scheme will be secure no matter what value of $w$ you choose.

-
understand, thanks by your reply, and Why to compute the verification key $Y$, $f$ is applied $2^w-1$ times? – juaninf Jul 2 '13 at 17:14

Though this question is fairly old, there is still no accepted answer. Hence, let me try to clarify this.

The W-OTS scheme that your talking about was proposed by Ralph Merkle in his 1979 paper as an improved version of the Lamport-Diffie OTS to reduce the size of signatures. Instead of a "per-bit-signature", Merkle proposed to sign multiple Bits at once. He was inspired by Robert Winternitz, hence the name.

$w$ is the number of bits that are signed simultaneously. Applying $F$ $2^{w-1}$ times allows for log($w$) Bits to be signed simultaneously.

Let me use the example from Merkle's paper. To sign 4 Bit strings, you would compute the verification key $F^{15}(x)$, where $x$ is the private key. To sign the number 9 (1001 in binary) you would compute $F^9(x)$. To verify this Signature, one would compute $F^6(F^9(x))$. By this the receiver would know that the sender computed $y$.

-