Take the 2-minute tour ×
Cryptography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for software developers, mathematicians and others interested in cryptography. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the section 2 (page 42) of the book "Post Quantum Cryptography", it says:

Then he generates the one-time signature $\sigma_{\text{OTS}}$ of the digest using the $s$-th one-time signature key $X_s$, $s\in\{0,\dots,2^H-1\}$.

My question: Is $s$ chosen in random form? Is it possible to have $s$ collisions to the signature process?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

If he chooses $s$ at random, then the scheme will be stateless but will fail after using the same $s$ twice, which should happen after giving approximately $\:$$\Theta$$\big(\hspace{-0.05 in}$ $2^{H/2}$$\hspace{-0.01 in}\big)\:$ signatures.

If he chooses $s$ by applying a PRF to $g(m)$, then the scheme will be deterministic and stateless,
but can be expected to fail after giving approximately $\:\Theta\left(2^{H/2}\right)\:$ signatures.

If he keeps an initially empty list as state, chooses $s$ at random from the leaves that are not on the list, puts $s$ into the list, and makes the list empty again if at this point it contains all of the leaves , then the scheme will need to keep an amount of state that grows linearly with the number of signatures given.
In this case, the scheme will fail after giving $\:2^H\hspace{-0.045 in}+\hspace{-0.03 in}1\:$ signatures.

If he chooses $s$ to be one more than the previous value of $s$ when there is a previous
value of $s$ and such a leaf, and chooses $s$ equal to $0$ in all other cases,
then the scheme will be deterministic but will need to keep $H$ bits of state.
In this case, the scheme will fail after giving $\:2^H\hspace{-0.045 in}+\hspace{-0.03 in}1\:$ signatures, and until that point,
each signature will also reveal and authenticate how many messages were previously signed.
That will stop an adversary from reordering the messages but will also reduce the signer's privacy.

(The following option was suggested by Paŭlo Ebermann in the comments.)
If he chooses $c$ in the way the previous paragraph described him choosing $s$, and chooses
$s$ by applying a PRP to $c$, then the scheme will be deterministic and need to keep $H$ bits
of state and fail after giving $\:2^H\hspace{-0.045 in}+\hspace{-0.03 in}1\:$ bits of state. $\:$ In this case, the scheme will enable
anyone who has the PRP's key (this will usually just the signer, although anyone else who
learns the signing key will know the PRP key too) to determine how many messages were
signed before a specific signature was given, and hide that information from everyone else.


I suspect that the most important thing is that the scheme be deterministic and stateless.

share|improve this answer
2  
I suppose one could also apply a (keyed) PRP on a counter to get $s$. –  Paŭlo Ebermann Jul 9 '13 at 19:55
    
understand, but in Merkle signature After I used a signature key $X_s$, this is not discarded, always? –  juaninf Nov 21 '13 at 15:07
1  
@juaninf : $\;\;\;$ In Merkle signatures, after signature key $X_s$ is used, $X_s$ is discarded so that someone else reading the location in memory that held $X_s$ would not result in a security failure, although $X_s$ could be regenerated from the overall signing key $X$. $\;\;\;\;\;\;$ –  Ricky Demer Nov 22 '13 at 9:40
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.