MD5 is a hash function that is no longer considered secure. It should only be used for backward compatibility.
4
votes
1answer
369 views
Is a second preimage attack on MD5 feasible?
What's the practical status of MD5 w.r.t. second-preimage?
Integrity of a piece of data is protected by an MD5 hash, itself assumed genuine. The data (and thus the hash) is known to the adversary. ...
5
votes
3answers
345 views
How to authenticate over open channel?
I am making an arduino project to open my garage door. I want to make it so users with the passphrase can open the door. Due to computational restrictions it is unlikely encryption is possible. ...
4
votes
2answers
554 views
128 bit hash with least chance of collision
I'm building a storage system for JSON documents where they are looked up on a 128 bit key. These JSON documents have a timestamp within them, but apart from that are user-entered data. These JSON ...
1
vote
3answers
295 views
reverse of md5sum
This might be out of ignorance, I apologize, but how complex of a problem might it be to generate a file of size N whose md5sum is X?
For example,
...
0
votes
2answers
213 views
Even passwords are vulnerable to hash collision attacks?
As stated in this page large documents hashed using md5 maybe vulnerable to collision attacks. My question is even passwords of 6-30 character are vulnerable to such hash collision attacks? If yes, is ...
