"Zero Knowledge Proof" is an interactive method for one party to prove to another that a statement is true, without revealing anything other than the veracity of the statement.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

1
vote
1answer
324 views

Correctness vs Completeness

What is the conceptual difference between the definition of correctness and completeness in verifiable cryptographic protocols? They justify that if a statement is correct then the verification should ...
1
vote
1answer
75 views

Fiat-Shamir security problem question

I am trying to understand the Fiat-Shamir identification protocol, but have a problem with understanding how this protocol is supposed to be save, even if you repeat it several times. I am using ...
1
vote
1answer
171 views

Homomorphic crypto allowing anonymous yes/no votes?

I'd need a crypto system allowing online yes/no votes but without revealing who voted what. Is a "partial" homomorphic crypto system what I'm after? Would, for example, Damgard-Jurik work in my case? ...
1
vote
1answer
222 views

Non-interactive Zero-knowledge proof signature validation without public key

I'm looking for a method for a scenario with following requirements: At least 3 people (A,B,C,...) are in a Network where they can broadcast messages to everyone but not communicate with a specific ...
1
vote
1answer
17 views

With ECDSA is there a way for the verifier to calculate any properties of $k$?

With ECDSA, given $(r,s)$ and $m$, is there a way for a verifier to calculate any (boolean) properties of $k$, without knowing $k$ or the private key $D_A$? (I understand that $k$ should be random, ...
1
vote
2answers
99 views

On the fly signatures and zero-knowledge

I am reading some articles which explain on the fly signatures (also called online/offine signatures). The principle is that a few operations do not depend of the message we want to sign, so these ...
1
vote
1answer
66 views

Fiat–Shamir: why do r and s have to be smaller than n?

I have a question regarding the Fiat–Shamir identification protocol. In this source (pdf) for example it says on pages 9 and 10 that the random commitment $r$ and the private key $s$ have to be ...
1
vote
1answer
57 views

server aid secure equality test

The scenario is like this: $P_1$ has $m_1$, $P_2$ has $m_2$, they want to compare whether $m_1=m_2$ via the server $S$. After the protocol, only $S$ knows the result, and there is no interaction ...
1
vote
1answer
279 views

How to prove that a ciphertext is encrypting multiplication of two values?

Zero-knowledge proofs with soundness, completness and zero-knowledge enable a prover to convince a verifier that a witness validates successfully a predicate without giving any information about the ...
1
vote
1answer
372 views

How can I prove in zero knowldege that an ElGamal shuffle is correct for a special setting? [closed]

In a special ElGamal encryption scheme, every user has an ElGamal encryption key-pair using the same cyclic group $G$ and generator $g$. The system has a special function : $$ ...
1
vote
1answer
109 views

Is secure remote snap possible?

Scenario: We have a central server $S$. We have a number of peripheral servers $P_i$ We have some individuals $U_j$ A given individual may be "known" to one or more peripheral servers. Each ...
1
vote
0answers
36 views

Prove that certain amount of data was stored

I'm looking for a way to prove that a certain amount of data was stored, through some easily verifiable piece of information. Similarly to how proof-of-work can prove through a hash that a certain ...
1
vote
0answers
61 views

Non-interactive zero-knowledge proof for discrete logarithm without random oracle

Is there any non-interactive zero-knowledge proof for discrete logarithm without random oracle over the group $\mathbb Z_p$?
1
vote
0answers
43 views

Commitment scheme to share money

I have such problem: party $X$ has an amount of money $M$, which it needs to share with $n$ other parties. Every week the amount of money is different. Let say not, that I am a party A, which is one ...
1
vote
1answer
43 views

The non-interactive proof of verifiable computation: Pinocchio

I am reading the Pinocchio paper. The paper says, in paragraph "polynomial asymptotics" of section 4.2.1, a worker, in order to include $h(s)$ into the proof, has to interpolate $p(x)$, and then ...
1
vote
1answer
69 views

Zero knowledge proof relation + number is binary

I want to develop a ZKPK for the following problem: $$Y=g_0^{r_Y} \prod_{i=1}^n g_i^{s_i}$$ and $$Z=h_0^{r_Z} \prod_{i=1}^n h_i^{s_i}$$ I want to proof knowledge of $r_Y,r_Z$ and $s_i$ which I have ...
1
vote
0answers
51 views

Zero knowledge of two factor

Here I overconfident in myself state that I can show, that n has two factors. This is not completely true, can possibly show $n$ is composite - prover generates RSA key with modulo $n$, and gives $e$ ...
1
vote
0answers
150 views

Zero Knowledge Non Interactive Proof with random oracle

I am trying to write an assay about Non Interactive Zero-Knowledge proofs and would like to take the simple discrete logarithm problem example fallowing the Feige-Fiat-Shamir heuristics. I understand ...
1
vote
0answers
56 views

Is there a way to “shorten” a Merkle chain?

If I have a Merkle chain of 3 items, is it possible to create a zero knowledge proof of the existance of a correct chain between hash 1 and hash 3? Editing to clarify (Thanks Ricky), what I mean my a ...
1
vote
0answers
88 views

Groth-Sahai proofs and hardness assumptions

I am learning Groth-Sahai NIZK proof system for Bilinear groups. While going through the literature, I am getting confused on how the proof system is related to Subspace Decision, SXDH or DLIN ...
1
vote
0answers
188 views

What would make it impossible to deny that decryption of a package has taken place?

I'm part of a team designing a system where a user have to be able to read a certain package, if he has preformed an action or series of actions that makes it legal for him to do so. The tricky part ...
1
vote
1answer
329 views

ZKIP for Paillier public key correctness

I'm using the Paillier cryptosystem in a protocol similar to mental poker. In the beginning of the protocol, each player generates a Paillier public key $(n,g)$. Later in the protocol, a player may ...
0
votes
1answer
59 views

Why is it a quadratic equation?

In Groth-Sahai NIZK proof system, they have defined something called Quadratic Equation in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ as shown below. But, my idea of quadratic equation was a second order polynomial equation in a ...
0
votes
1answer
86 views

Blum primes [x=3(mod 4)] zero knowledge proof?

Lets say we have 2 primes, $p \equiv q \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$, and we make $n=p \times q$ public. I can, without revealing factors, show that $n$ has two prime factors. How can i zero knowledge prove ...
0
votes
1answer
187 views

Secure Multiparty Sum in malicious model using threshold encryption

Suppose $n$ actors each hold a plaintext $p_i$. We wish to find $\sum p_i$, without leaking any information about individual $p_i$. Any actor (or any link in the network) could be controlled by an ...
0
votes
1answer
78 views

Authentication mechanism for low memory, low computing power device

I am looking for an authentication mechanism that works best with low memory, low computing power devices. I came across a paper "A Practical Zero-Knowledge Protocol Fitted to Security Microprocessor ...
0
votes
1answer
223 views

Zero Knowledge auth schemes with weak secret

In Zero Knowledge auth schemes the public DH factor of each peer is encrypted with a potentially weak pre-shared secret and the resulting ciphertexts are exchanged over an insecure channel. Why is no ...
0
votes
1answer
77 views

How to prove knowledge of discrete logarithm in a product?

Definitions Suppose I have two large safe primes $p$ and $q$, and a composite number $N=pq$. I have $G$, a large cyclic subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}^{*}_{N}$; $g$ and $h$ are generators of $G$. I commit ...
0
votes
1answer
62 views

Constructing set membership proof for private set

Is it possible to construct a set membership proof to show $\delta \in \Psi$ where $\delta$ is publicly known and $\Psi$ should stay only known to the prover? It seems rather impossible but I would ...
0
votes
1answer
49 views

Group Dependent Language

The text below has been taken from the below paper Groth-Sahai Paper. The relevant part is highlighted in red. What does this group-dependent language mean in this context? From the definition of a ...
0
votes
0answers
57 views

Zero-Knowledge Proof of Subgraph Isomorphism

I'm trying to find a Zero-Knowledge proof of subgraph isomorphism in the following scenario: Alice and Bob both know about graphs G1 and ...
0
votes
0answers
31 views

Zero knowledge proof of bilinear equation

Suppose A and B have pre-shared a secret key $r$. Is there a way for A to prove that $p=[e(a,b)e(g^{c_i},b)]^r$ has been correctly computed with this $r$ but without knowing or revealing either a,b or ...
0
votes
0answers
65 views

zero knowledge framework for c programs - how to prove correct C program execution with private inputs

I am looking for a zk framework that could be used for proving correct execution of programs written in C (or any other high level language) such as: I know x s.t. SHA-256(x) = y (y is public, x is ...
0
votes
0answers
49 views

Role of trusted party in the Ideal model in Malicious case

Imagine there is a protocol supporting outosurced multi party computation. There are three parties involved in the protocol: client $A$, client $B$ and a server. Client $A$ and $B$ send their private ...
0
votes
0answers
70 views

arithmetic calculation problem to quadratic arithmetic program

I am reading the Pinocchio paper (verifiable computation): http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/180286/pinocchio.pdf The paper is rather hard for me. I am considering this calculation problem: ...
0
votes
1answer
31 views

Figure 2 in the Verifiable Computation - Pinocchio

I am reading the Pinocchio paper (verifiable computation): http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/180286/pinocchio.pdf The paper is rather hard for me. For the Figure 2, I guess $v_1(x)$ should be ...
0
votes
1answer
93 views

Verification of Pinocchio (verifiable computation)

I am reading the Pinocchio paper. The calculated result $y$ is a part of the verification input, but it seems to me, the verification procedure does not utilize the result $y$. Can anyone can help me ...
-1
votes
1answer
156 views

Burn after read algorythm. Software verification on compromised environment. Software smart card

Please help me pick right design of software… I have to design client-server software, where the server should verify that the client runs software from specific source code. It has to be verifiable ...
-1
votes
1answer
61 views

Hiding and Binding key in Groth-Sahai NIZK proof system

In context of Groth-Sahai NIZK proof system, I have a couple of doubts on Hiding and Binding keys. In case of hiding keys (highlighted in red), how is it ensured that $\tau(A) \subseteq \langle ...
-2
votes
1answer
98 views

Isn't Groth-Sahai proof system applicable beyond Bilinear groups?

Classical paper by Groth-Sahai on NIZK proof system is titled as "Efficient Non-interactive Proof Systems for Bilinear Groups". To my understanding, only (Pairing Product Equation) PPE are defined ...
-2
votes
1answer
203 views

Zero Knowledge Proof for Correctness of the product of additive ElGamal Ciphers [duplicate]

Suppose we use Additive ElGamal defined as follows: Let $(K,E,D)$ be a triple. The key-generator $K$ outputs the description of a finite multiplicative group $G$ of prime order $q$, with three ...