Hot answers tagged sha-3
8
From John Kelsey on the NIST mailing list for SHA-3 (http://cio.nist.gov/esd/emaildir/lists/hash-forum/msg02656.html if you are on it — it's password-protected):
a. We plan to allow the collision and preimage resistance to be the same for SHA3, since that fits with the notion of a single security level, and since that will substantially improve hashing ...
7
As fgrieu pointed out, the constants are defined in terms of a binary Linear Feedback Shift Register. Because LFSRs can be represented very efficiently using standard logic gates they have been used for pseudorandom number generation computers for decades. They have fallen out of favor for use directly as secure stream ciphers due to advances in ...
5
In short, the answer is yes, if the full 512 bit hash output length of Keccak[r=1088,c=512] is used, this provides security up to 2256 operations against Grover's quantum algorithm.
Using Grover's algorithm, one can find a preimage of a n-bit hash function in time 2n/2 with a quantum computer. This is a generic attack in the sense that it applies to any ...
2
First, lets get some thing clear over here. The analysis of Grover's algorithm is asymptotic, so it is fairly unfair to perform something as concrete as the setting you have mentioned.
Grover's algorithm gives you an asymptotic upper bound of $O(\sqrt{N})$ for searching in an unsorted array of size $N$ so I have trouble understanding how one can claim that ...
1
I can at least point to how the constant are derived. Quoting the Keccak Reference
This is not a rationale, and I confess that I do not quite get how we go from that to the values.
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible