meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | 6 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 9 |
|
1d |
comment |
How much data can I encrypt with AES before I need to change the key in CBC mode? These seem as notes from coursera Dan Boneh's crypto course |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Is Functional Encryption about Access Control over encrypted data alone? I explain you clearly with arguments on the base difference. Two constructions for different purposes. Argue for that and if you don't agree or i am mistaken explain please. don't cite |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Is Functional Encryption about Access Control over encrypted data alone? @sashank. There are no connections at all. In FHE you produce the encrypted version of an operation on encrypted data. In functional encryption you learn the result of a function applied on encrypted data |
|
May 16 |
answered | Is Functional Encryption about Access Control over encrypted data alone? |
|
May 7 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
May 7 |
comment |
CBC-MAC , fixed length, all blocks returned I can't believe the #523 corrected the #9,725 :) |
|
May 6 |
revised |
CBC-MAC , fixed length, all blocks returned typo error |
|
May 6 |
suggested | suggested edit on CBC-MAC , fixed length, all blocks returned |
|
May 3 |
comment |
CBC-MAC , fixed length, all blocks returned Why you want to do that? What is the scenario? |
|
May 1 |
awarded | Enthusiast |
|
Apr 29 |
accepted | Secure order preserving hash function |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function Right because they can't prove that in semantic security game INT-CPA then they look at left or right in which extra restrictions are made, they stipulate that even LoR game is not enough and then they describe the ideal OPE and they compare it with a real one. |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function if breaking means not semantically secure that implies indistinguishability which if you can recover plaintext obviously doesn't hold then it's broken...(?) |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function Then through that attack i can break any Order preserving "encryption" scheme once i have access to an oracle that is encrypting for me... OPE |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function what if the hash function is not publicly available and it's keyed |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function @fgrieu Is it possible to fix a keyed hash function then that is order-preserving and first-preimage resistant? |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function @fgrieu i am wondering if this is the only way to preserve the order. Just by prepending the value before a crypto hash... |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function But the same approach can be applied to reserve the encryption scheme, with a binary search, given many e encryptions of ciphertexts or i am wrong...?Would a keyed order preserving hash function sounds feasible? |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function I want a representation of plaintexts such that: 1) order of plaintexts is preserved into their scrambed representation (digest if hash ciphertext if encryption), 2)I want this to be one-way with no inversion. These requirements seem to me to resemble into a hash and not an encryption scheme. Am i wrong on that? |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
Secure order preserving hash function I mean for the same reason order preserving encryption is not considered as secure encryption OPHF wouldn't considered as secure hash... |
