network profile
| bio | website | pronux.ch |
|---|---|---|
| location | Switzerland | |
| age | 38 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | May 14 at 15:02 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
English: I'm specialized in the end-to-end integration between popular open source e-commerce solutions, such as nopCommerce, osCommerce, OpenCart, PrestaShop und Magento Commerce and Microsoft Dynamics NAV (Navision) ERP System. With our connectors and add-ons for Microsoft Dynamics NAV it is possible to sync customer, order, item, payment and shipping information bi-directionally in realtime between the systems.
German: Ich bin spezialisiert auf die Integration von bekannten Open Source E-Commerce Lösungen wie nopCommerce, osCommerce, OpenCart, PrestaShop und Magento Commerce in Microsoft Dynamics NAV. Mit unserem Connector für Microsoft Dynamics NAV können Kundendaten, Bestelldaten und Artikeldaten wie auch Zahlungsmethoden/Zahlungsarten und Lieferinformationen zwischen den Systemen bidirektional und in Echtzeit automatisch ausgetauscht (synchronisiert) werden. Specialties
Open Source E-Commerce Integration, Microsoft Dynamics NAV (Navision), Magento Connector for Microsoft Dynamics NAV (Navision), nopCommerce Connector for Microsoft Dynamics NAV (Navision)
|
Mar 11 |
comment |
X.509 CSR: Why does CA remove signature? btw: I've asked this question because I'm developing an app which creates a self-signed certificate for the user. This cert needs to be "confirmed" by a central CA. How does it work: The app sends the self-signed cert to the CA which issues a new cert with the users public key in it. This process is very simple and also I would have no clue how to implement CSR in different languages (javascript, perl etc..) |
|
Mar 11 |
comment |
X.509 CSR: Why does CA remove signature? At the moment afaik X.509 does not allow to attach a second signature to a self-signed certificate. In "my world" you would be able to send a self-signed certificate to the CA (since I'm a web developer, for example to an URI www.myca.com/cert/sign), then the CA adds additional attributes to it and sign this "extended cert" with its own private key. |
|
Mar 10 |
comment |
X.509 CSR: Why does CA remove signature? Now we have 2 formats: CSR and X.509. In my world only X.509 would exist but in two different "flavors": self-signed certificates and self-signed certificates which are signed by a CA (the CA only adds additional attributes and its signature to it). |
|
Mar 8 |
comment |
Simple/beginner level explanation of salt "Salt is usually assumed to be known to the attacker" -> Who is assuming this? |
