| bio | website | github.com/CodesInChaos |
|---|---|---|
| location | Munich, Germany | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 10 months |
| seen | 36 mins ago | |
| stats | profile views | 109 |
- Jabber/XMPP: CodeInChaos@jabber.ccc.de
- IRC: CodesInChaos on freenode
- Email: My nick on gmail
- Blog: codesinchaos.wordpress.com
- GitHub: github.com/CodesInChaos
- Google+
- Twitter @CodesInChaos
|
Jul 27 |
revised |
How secure is my OTP program? edited tags |
|
Jul 27 |
revised |
Can I jettison MAC if I already have SHA1(M)? removed security tag |
|
Jul 26 |
revised |
Can I pre-define the points in Shamir's Secret Sharing algorithm edited tags |
|
Jul 26 |
asked | Purpose of outer key in HMAC |
|
Jul 26 |
comment |
Are mouse movement coordinates useful as a seed for a RNG? A 64 bit seed is far too small to be secure. And a single mouse position doesn't even have close to 64 bits of entropy. It doesn't even have 20 bits of entropy. |
|
Jul 26 |
comment |
Are mouse movement coordinates useful as a seed for a RNG? Why don't you just use the random number generator built into your operating system? |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Signature and Timestamp for Long Term Document Archival Question Aren't there some timestamp services that are based on publishing hashes? |
|
Jul 22 |
comment |
Using same keypair for Diffie-Hellman and signing The master key approach doesn't help either, since I try to minimize the size of the public key. I considered using the hash of two separate public keys, but that's annoying in some of my intended uses. After reading the paper I linked, I think the risk of using EC-DH + EC-Schnorr is acceptable compared to the risk of mistakes in other security relevant parts of the protocol and implementation. |
|
Jul 22 |
comment |
Using same keypair for Diffie-Hellman and signing The first distinction is not between encryption and signatures, it's between authentication and confidentiality keys. In particular if you authenticate emails using a key-exchange based algorithm[Which I prefer over signatures], it has the same life cycle as a key used for signing. |
|
Jul 22 |
comment |
Can ECDSA signatures be safely made “deterministic”? Related blog entry: Surviving a bad RNG Scroll down to ECDSA signatures |
|
Jul 22 |
revised |
Using same keypair for Diffie-Hellman and signing added 164 characters in body; edited tags |
|
Jul 22 |
answered | Using same keypair for Diffie-Hellman and signing |
|
Jul 21 |
comment |
Can I jettison MAC if I already have SHA1(M)? @Fixee If you validate the padding first, and only then hash, and attacker might be able to use that to decrypt the message, even if he can't replace it by his own. |
|
Jul 21 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jul 21 |
answered | Can I jettison MAC if I already have SHA1(M)? |
|
Jul 21 |
comment |
Uncompress the winRar password protected file without password. (not brute force attacking) The method of encryption is less important. The interesting part is what kind of KDF WinRAR uses, |
|
Jul 20 |
revised |
Is there difference between Algebraic Homomorphic Encryption and Fully Homomorphic Encryption Schemes? deleted 2 characters in body; edited title |
|
Jul 19 |
comment |
Is there any recent cryptographic algorithm especially designed for low-level processors? Where does the plaintext come from? Does it get generated by the PC program? |
|
Jul 19 |
comment |
Is there any recent cryptographic algorithm especially designed for low-level processors? What kind of algorithm do you need? Symmetric encryption? a hash function? key-exchange? signatures? MAC? Authenticated encryption? |
|
Jul 18 |
comment |
Other than brute force, are there any attacks on Threefish-512 using only a single known plaintext block? Both attacks only work on reduced round ThreeFish, and not on the full Threefish. The first one only works that well on older versions of Threefish. |