| bio | website | github.com/CodesInChaos |
|---|---|---|
| location | Munich, Germany | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 10 months |
| seen | 5 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 109 |
- Jabber/XMPP: CodeInChaos@jabber.ccc.de
- IRC: CodesInChaos on freenode
- Email: My nick on gmail
- Blog: codesinchaos.wordpress.com
- GitHub: github.com/CodesInChaos
- Google+
- Twitter @CodesInChaos
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
How to sign a message using RSA? Look into the relevant Mono classes. With a bit of work, many of them work on .net, and the license is permissive. |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
How to sign a message using RSA? Read PKCS#1, in particular don't ignore the part about padding. |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
Questions about Key Derivation Functions Your description is a bit vague. But I assumed that with ` AES(⋅,m)` you meant putting the master key into m and using the purpose as key. And that's clearly a bad idea. |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
Questions about Key Derivation Functions "Would AES(⋅,m) for a fixed m be equivalent?", no since it's reversible. The purpose/counter is known, and since you use it as key, the message can be recovered from any K_i, and then you can derive all other K_j. |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
Identifying cryptography cipher At least you posted the source, and not just a random bunch of bytes, like most that ask such a question do |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
Can a proof be constructed to show there is no distinguisher? There is at least some PRNGs for which proofs exist that show that they're indistinguishable provided a certain other problem is hard. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blum_Blum_Shub |
|
Apr 24 |
answered | Existing dictionaries of popular words to help solve a random substitution cipher? |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
Question about hash collisions @Mads yes of course. |
|
Apr 23 |
revised |
Question about hash collisions edited body |
|
Apr 23 |
revised |
Question about hash collisions added 155 characters in body |
|
Apr 23 |
revised |
Question about hash collisions added 5 characters in body |
|
Apr 23 |
answered | Question about hash collisions |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
Question about hash collisions If you extend this scheme directly to a tree-hash it will be trivially vulnerable to collisions with a different length. That's why tree-hashes typically use a different hash function for inner hashes and leaf hashes. |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
Existing dictionaries of popular words to help solve a random substitution cipher? List of words occuring in en.wikipedia ordered by popularity: the-interweb.com/serendipity/index.php?/archives/… |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
How secure is the Vigenère cipher in file encryption if you encrypt the password first? @Ephraim If you want to go that way, you should simply use an existing stream cipher. |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Can a digital money system exist, that's secure, anonymous and allows offline transactions? While I don't really like such schemes(I already described it in the question as one that falls a bit short of my expectations), it's probably the best thing you can get if you want offline spendability, so I'll accept this answer. My personal consequence is that offline spendability should be sacrificed, in favor of higher anonymity, and in protocol enforceability. |
|
Apr 22 |
accepted | Can a digital money system exist, that's secure, anonymous and allows offline transactions? |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Can a digital money system exist, that's secure, anonymous and allows offline transactions? 1) I'm not interested in quantum schemes 2) I understand that payments are untraceable in the ideal case, thanks to blind signatures. But in order to get the name embedded into the tokens, I need to register each payment I send/receive with my bank in my name, even if the bank doesn't learn who was the partner in the transaction. 3) An honest mistake can also easily lead to deanomymization via double-spend. For example you restore from backup, or your application crashes at an unfortunate time. 3) It also leads to unbounded financial risk for the victim if somebody steals the tokens |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Which blind signature schemes exist, and how do they compare? added 476 characters in body |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Blind signature with openssl edited tags |