network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | Jun 12 '12 at 12:39 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
May 31 |
accepted | When to prefer exchanging cryptographic certificates over exchanging only public keys? |
|
May 31 |
comment |
When to prefer exchanging cryptographic certificates over exchanging only public keys? Yes I know, CA doesn't need to be online any time, but failure could also mean that the CA gets compromised. I put it in brackets anyway, because my main concern why I don't want it is that having a single authority is against p2p design. However, I think I have understood the problem now. Thanks again! |
|
May 31 |
comment |
When to prefer exchanging cryptographic certificates over exchanging only public keys? Thanks! Looks interesting |
|
May 31 |
comment |
When to prefer exchanging cryptographic certificates over exchanging only public keys? Thanks for the extensive answer. Actually I am talking about some kind of p2p network. Due to the nature of this networks, that is completely against central points (of failure[;)]) its not possible to introduce a CA. Are there alternative approaches? |
|
May 31 |
asked | When to prefer exchanging cryptographic certificates over exchanging only public keys? |
|
May 30 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
May 30 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
May 30 |
accepted | Safely use CryptSignAndEncryptMessage? |
|
May 30 |
awarded | Student |
|
May 29 |
asked | Safely use CryptSignAndEncryptMessage? |
