meta user
network profile
| bio | website | none.seriously |
|---|---|---|
| location | Switzerland | |
| age | 28 | |
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | Apr 23 at 12:54 | |
| stats | profile views | 2 |
Physicist.
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Is a continuous stream of encrypted data embedded in garbage more or less secure than only encrypting the data? Well, I spotted only the symptom while you removed the cause first and then wondered about the cough :-7 Anyway you're right that the garbage shouldn't be encoded, while the "correct" garbage might allow keeping actual data transmission times sufficiently secret |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Time Capsule cryptography? Finally a solution involving uncheatable physical time |
|
Aug 13 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug 13 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
K out of N encryption +1 since I just wanted to ask the same question... |
|
Aug 13 |
comment |
Is a continuous stream of encrypted data embedded in garbage more or less secure than only encrypting the data? Thanks for your answer - re "How so?" I only thought of the implication of encrypting the garbage as well, leading to the KPA, instead of simply considering the smart way™ of just using random data of entropy comparable to the encrypted data... I.e. your reply to sending encrypted pseudo-random data already makes by KPA-statement superfluous. |
|
Aug 13 |
awarded | Student |
|
Aug 13 |
asked | Is a continuous stream of encrypted data embedded in garbage more or less secure than only encrypting the data? |
|
Aug 13 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
