network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | Mar 19 at 10:25 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Mar 19 |
accepted | Selecting a large NUMS Safe prime |
|
Mar 19 |
revised |
Selecting a large NUMS Safe prime edited title |
|
Mar 19 |
revised |
Selecting a large NUMS Safe prime deleted 30 characters in body |
|
Mar 19 |
asked | Selecting a large NUMS Safe prime |
|
Oct 14 |
awarded | Student |
|
Aug 27 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug 27 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Aug 27 |
comment |
Secure Hash Function based on AES Yes of course. I forgot it's easy to decrypt arbitrary strings of bytes in AES. But of course if the plain-text and cipher lengths are always the same than this has to be true |
|
Aug 27 |
accepted | Secure Hash Function based on AES |
|
Aug 27 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Aug 27 |
revised |
Secure Hash Function based on AES I wasn't thinking of the case where the message is 32 bytes long. I changed it to always add a zero-block to the end |
|
Aug 27 |
asked | Secure Hash Function based on AES |
