| bio | website | lamontconsulting.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | New York, NY | |
| age | 36 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | 5 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 7 |
SSL isn't good enough. Your website can be hacked.
Help solve the problem by advocating these RFCs:
TLSA (formerly DANE for DNS) Fixes the hackable CA problem
TLS-OBC: Fixes TLS, and the Related Domain Cookie Attack
About me
I have no relation to the above sites; I am just an advocate
Why "makerofthings7"? It's a challenge to "make seven things in my life of significant quality and value". Who knows if those things will take the form of software, art, or people. (I'm not married, no kids yet)
See ...my LinkedIn profile
|
5h |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
2d |
comment |
Generating IV in TLS 1.2 I'd be curious to see your C# implementation. Do share a link if you can. |
|
2d |
comment |
When truncating an AES MAC value by “w” , how do I justify that “w” is still negligible? I learned something new today en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotic_security |
|
May 17 |
comment |
When truncating an AES MAC value by “w” , how do I justify that “w” is still negligible? Is it correct for me to think/say "negligible in terms of brute forcing". Does negligible apply to any other attack other than brute forcing? |
|
May 17 |
asked | When truncating an AES MAC value by “w” , how do I justify that “w” is still negligible? |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
LT codes with Homomorphic hashing Dumb question: What does the symbol ⊕ mean? |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
How can two UProve token holders prove to a 3rd party that they aren't the same user? I see it here.. will read it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_signature |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
How can two UProve token holders prove to a 3rd party that they aren't the same user? I'm very interested in learning how this would operate, though the Wiki page for ecash is of no use, and all the pages are dead. Do you have any more info or references so I can understand what you mean by a "blind signature on a serial number"... and it's removal? |
|
Mar 27 |
comment |
How can two UProve token holders prove to a 3rd party that they aren't the same user? So that means the issuer needs N attributes, and selectively disclosing them one by one? I suppose I need to mention that the quantity of locations the UProve user will be dealing with numbers in the the millions. A UProve token with just 255 proofs takes quite a long time to generate. I hope there is another solution. |
|
Mar 27 |
asked | How can two UProve token holders prove to a 3rd party that they aren't the same user? |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it This is very helpful and is a great starting point for my independent studies (even the terms are helpful). Since the Key based approach is based on RSA primes, and I'm trying to integrate with UProve (based on the intractable discrete logarithm problem) is it possible to adapt your line of thinking into this type of mathematical foundation? I'm doing thought experiments on using UProve to display a constant to Alice1 and a different constant when speaking to Alice2... AliceN. Charlie could deduce Bobs ID across every Alice, but the consortium of Alice's couldn't do the same without Bob. |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Hashing or encrypting twice to increase security? FYI - This answer was referenced on Bitcoin.SE |
|
Mar 15 |
comment |
What is the significance of i^Q mod P = 1 and are there any special properties to be aware of? Aaah "Group Theory" that is what I needed! Thank you @RickyDemer |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
What is the significance of i^Q mod P = 1 and are there any special properties to be aware of? Thank you @RickyDemer . I'm not familiar with the symbols ℤ∗P let alone how to type it correctly in Markup. Rather than bore this forum with these questions (unless it's on-topic), what should I learn (where should I learn it) to speak this language? |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it I'm fascinated by this subject matter.. if you have links to delegation or revocation that would be tremendously helpful. |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it Does either system allow for Bob to anonymously assert Age > 21 so that each assertion can't be correlated among different relying parties? |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
What is the significance of i^Q mod P = 1 and are there any special properties to be aware of? @RickyDemer Just as there is something called the Discreet Logarithm problem that's used in crypto, I think this has a name in the crypto world. I'm short on meaningful vocabulary but think this has 1) a name, 2) a context it's considered useful , 3) Other proofs that may make it useful in various applications. |
|
Mar 13 |
revised |
What is the significance of i^Q mod P = 1 and are there any special properties to be aware of? added 49 characters in body |
|
Mar 13 |
asked | What is the significance of i^Q mod P = 1 and are there any special properties to be aware of? |
|
Mar 13 |
accepted | Learning cryptography using a FPGA |