meta user
network profile
| bio | website | lamontconsulting.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | New York, NY | |
| age | 36 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | 21 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 7 |
SSL isn't good enough. Your website can be hacked.
Help solve the problem by advocating these RFCs:
TLSA (formerly DANE for DNS) Fixes the hackable CA problem
TLS-OBC: Fixes TLS, and the Related Domain Cookie Attack
About me
I have no relation to the above sites; I am just an advocate
Why "makerofthings7"? It's a challenge to "make seven things in my life of significant quality and value". Who knows if those things will take the form of software, art, or people. (I'm not married, no kids yet)
See ...my LinkedIn profile
|
Mar 12 |
comment |
What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it How much depth should you go into? I admit I'm not that well versed in all the mathematics (and symbols) of cryptography but I will study whatever you share until I understand it completely/100%. I'll study the 101 terminology wherever it's offered. |
|
Mar 12 |
comment |
What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it @RickyDemer If Bob did publish something, Alice shouldn't know it, or shouldn't be able to use it for anything useful, lest Bob's purchases get correlated (Sweaters, and amazon purchases). There should be something that prevents forwarding Bob's credentials. One idea is Alice should send a challenge to Bob, (so the exchange is bound to the current session) and Bob sends Charlie's verification (of Bob's relative age and address) to Alice. |
|
Mar 12 |
revised |
What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it added 509 characters in body |
|
Mar 12 |
revised |
What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it added 301 characters in body |
|
Mar 12 |
asked | What crypto system allows for 3 parties: Party 1 who makes an assertion, Party 2 mutates the assertion, Party 3 validates it |
|
Feb 14 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Feb 11 |
accepted | How do other, non-RSA algorithms, compare to the PKCS #1 standard? |
|
Feb 11 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 15 |
comment |
Is there a field guide to ECC for the IT Security layman? @Thomas FYI The +3 votes came from Security.SE, not the more discriminating Crypto.SE site, who could (and probably already did) write a book on this. I'd have to think about how to slice this up, but feel free to edit as you think ... |
|
Dec 14 |
revised |
Is there a field guide to ECC for the IT Security layman? migrated to new site... get new tags |
|
Dec 14 |
asked | Is there a field guide to ECC for the IT Security layman? |
|
Nov 26 |
asked | Learning cryptography using a FPGA |
|
Aug 4 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jul 2 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jul 2 |
comment |
Does a high exponent compensate for a low degree of certainty? Suppose I want to create that situation, I'd need a low exponent? How low would be appropriate? |
|
Jul 2 |
accepted | How can I protect against the failure of a block or symmetric cipher? |
|
Jul 2 |
accepted | Impacts of not using RSA exponent of 65537 |
|
Jul 2 |
asked | Does a high exponent compensate for a low degree of certainty? |
|
Jul 2 |
accepted | What is the correct value for “certainty” in RSA key pair generation? |
|
Jul 1 |
revised |
Impacts of not using RSA exponent of 65537 added 112 characters in body |
