154 reputation
4
bio website
location
age
visits member for 7 months
seen yesterday
stats profile views 0

1d
awarded  Critic
1d
comment Proper Way to Encrypt Data with Two Keys?
You are describing your proposed solution instead of describing your problem/goal.
Apr
24
answered Attacking historical ciphers methodology
Apr
24
revised Using the output of a stream cipher, how to guarantee the integrity of 4 bytes of data?
added 451 characters in body
Apr
24
answered Using the output of a stream cipher, how to guarantee the integrity of 4 bytes of data?
Apr
2
comment How to calculate y value from ((y*y) mod prime) efficiently
it's the other way around: You can square any value, but not every value has a square root. If you have $y^2$, then $\pm y$ will be the two square roots. If you just try to calculate the root of a random value, there might not be one.
Mar
25
comment Perfectly hiding / binding commitment scheme
I did not say "Alice needs to be computationally unbound to decomit any value" (for perfect hiding). Perfect hiding just implies, that decomitment of any value is possible. And this is equal to "(unbounded) Bob can learn no information from the commitment alone.", which is what you describe with "Bob's view is independent of Alice's value"
Mar
25
answered Where can I begin to study the math behind modern cryptography?
Mar
25
comment Security of Deterministic Encryption Scheme
Ehm, I am not sure where you're going with this, and maybe you should specify which information should be retrievable by whom, and who has the private key(s).
Mar
25
awarded  Editor
Mar
25
revised How to calculate y value from ((y*y) mod prime) efficiently
added 468 characters in body
Mar
22
comment Perfectly hiding / binding commitment scheme
Uhm, yes... that's the same coin from the other side. Decomitment to ANY value is possible. If Alice is comp. unbound, she can decomit anything. If Bob is unbound, he still can not figure out Alice input.
Mar
22
answered How to calculate y value from ((y*y) mod prime) efficiently
Mar
22
comment How would one crack a weak but unknown encryption protocol?
This is it. From even a couple of ciphertexts you wont get much. almost anything is secure against ciphertext only attacks. The next step is knowledge about the plaintext (distribution, common patterns, etc), and then the known plaintext attack. At this point most historical algorithms cracked (Enigma etc.).
Mar
22
answered Security of Deterministic Encryption Scheme
Mar
22
answered Perfectly hiding / binding commitment scheme
Mar
22
answered Comparison: complexity measures vs. security
Dec
21
comment Why the following attack in common modulus RSA works?
"Computing the RSA Secret Key Is Deterministic Polynomial Time Equivalent to Factoring" from May explains, how to get $(p,q)$ from $(e,d)$ in poly time. This means, $u_1$ will just factorize $N$ and calculate the private key of $u_2$.
Dec
21
answered What would the Internet be like without public-key cryptography?
Nov
27
comment Cracking WWII-era codes - code found on a pigeon's leg in Surrey
One time pad is: non-repeating and truly random. A Stream cipher with a repeating short sequence is called Vigenere cipher, and was broken about 150 years ago. The alternative with text passages of books as keystream can be seen as a variant... a very unsafe one at that. Words in any written language have certain characteristics, which makes them insecure.