Reputation
413
Top tag
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Access review queues
Badges
1 6 13
Newest
 Yearling
Impact
~23k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 8 votes cast
Mar
31
awarded  Yearling
Jan
12
awarded  Favorite Question
Jun
30
awarded  Good Question
Jun
18
awarded  Autobiographer
May
18
awarded  Editor
May
16
awarded  Informed
Mar
16
awarded  Famous Question
Nov
3
awarded  Good Answer
Apr
4
awarded  Nice Question
Jan
7
awarded  Notable Question
Jan
5
awarded  Yearling
Sep
8
awarded  Popular Question
Aug
23
awarded  Nice Answer
Dec
13
accepted What are the differences between a digital signature, a MAC and a hash?
Dec
12
comment Can I use PGP to sign a message without providing cryptographic non-repudation?
If the sender uses a one-time signing key, how would this provide authentication at all? How would the recipient know that the one-time signing key is associated with the sender's validated master signing key?
Dec
12
comment Can I use PGP to sign a message without providing cryptographic non-repudation?
If understand correctly, an MDC provides some level of integrity, but not authentication. After all, even with an MDC, an attacker could just use the recipient's public key to create a new encrypted message. What I'm asking for is authentication without non-repudiation. I realise the non-repudiation OpenPGP offers isn't good enough for court, but it could be good enough for another OpenPGP user.
Dec
12
awarded  Critic
Dec
11
awarded  Self-Learner
Dec
10
comment What are the differences between a digital signature, a MAC and a hash?
@PaĆ­loEbermann: that's perfect, thanks! Your edit was substantial so I enabled "community wiki" on my answer, it's only fair.
Dec
10
awarded  Teacher