| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Braga, Portugal | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | Jun 12 at 8:17 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
|
May 4 |
accepted | CBC-MAC , fixed length, all blocks returned |
|
May 3 |
comment |
CBC-MAC , fixed length, all blocks returned I'm not seeing a practical use of this. I just want to know, in theory, why this is insecure. |
|
May 3 |
asked | CBC-MAC , fixed length, all blocks returned |
|
Apr 1 |
comment |
Voice Call Safety I've put this question on security exchange since it is more related to security than cryptography. Thanks for the response. |
|
Apr 1 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Apr 1 |
accepted | Voice Call Safety |
|
Apr 1 |
asked | Voice Call Safety |
|
Nov 19 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Nov 19 |
accepted | Using CBC with a fixed IV and a random first plaintext block |
|
Nov 19 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 19 |
comment |
Using CBC with a fixed IV and a random first plaintext block I guess it will spend an additional block per cipher operation. Can't see where it is linear the size of the ciphertext. |
|
Nov 19 |
comment |
Using CBC with a fixed IV and a random first plaintext block You didn't answer my question. I asked if this approach is considered as safe as the classical CBC with random IV. |
|
Nov 19 |
asked | Using CBC with a fixed IV and a random first plaintext block |