Reputation
2,823
Top tag
Next privilege 3,000 Rep.
Cast close & reopen votes
Badges
7 18
Newest
 Yearling
Impact
~57k people reached

Jan
24
comment Is there any more information on this RSA backdoor?
While this is certainly a smart alternative scheme, I do not believe this answers the question. It does not shed additional light on the scheme mentioned above.
Jan
24
comment Is there any more information on this RSA backdoor?
@fgrieu There are two different keyspaces here. One assuming an agent with knowledge of $A$, and one without that knowledge. Presumably, if you know $A$ the key space is $256$ bits.
Jan
24
comment Is there any more information on this RSA backdoor?
I would suggest using two different symbols for the two $k$s, as they do not refer to the same value.
Jan
7
awarded  Yearling
Jun
23
awarded  Caucus
Jun
23
awarded  Constituent
May
11
awarded  Popular Question
May
10
revised Reciprocal block ciphers
added 21 characters in body
May
10
comment Reciprocal block ciphers
@Melab That's just silly. You can make it swap the halves after the last round without any loss to security - any attacker can trivially swap halves of the ciphertext as they please.
May
10
answered Reciprocal block ciphers
May
10
comment Reciprocal block ciphers
When you say reciprocal block cipher, do you mean that $Dk$ and $Ek$ are the same function?
May
2
comment Clefia Vs AES 128 bit
@tony9099 Sorry, all these questions can be answered by simple googling - not going to do that work for you.
May
2
answered Clefia Vs AES 128 bit
Mar
30
comment Is this a valid scheme to authenticate through a 'human-readable' certificate?
While I do not 100% agree with your notions in point #1 and #2, I did not consider the attack where Eve swaps out questions for those she knows the answer with. Do you know of any secure scheme where two human users can prove their identity to eachother through some means without having shared a cryptographical certificate/secret beforehand? Is it possible at all?
Mar
30
accepted Is this a valid scheme to authenticate through a 'human-readable' certificate?
Mar
30
comment Is this a valid scheme to authenticate through a 'human-readable' certificate?
You have no idea how much entropy there is with question/answers, it could be an arbitrary amount. Could you elaborate on your replay attack? I don't fully understand what Eve would replay, and how it would affect security.
Mar
30
comment Is there an existing authorative definition of the cryptographic term 'pepper'
@RichieFrame Forgive me, but isn't giving an advantage to systems with more cores the opposite of what you want? The less parallel an attack, the more expensive it becomes.
Mar
30
revised Is this a valid scheme to authenticate through a 'human-readable' certificate?
edited body
Mar
28
revised Is this a valid scheme to authenticate through a 'human-readable' certificate?
added 7 characters in body
Mar
27
comment Is this a valid scheme to authenticate through a 'human-readable' certificate?
@RickyDemer I clarified in the question that Eve does not know the answer to the questions at least until the long-term exchange of certificates has completed.