network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 3 months |
| seen | Feb 16 at 14:16 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Feb 13 |
comment |
MD5 implementation Thank you very much for the hint about SHA-3. I have been looking into it and it seems interesting. I think I'll give it a try. |
|
Feb 11 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Feb 11 |
accepted | MD5 implementation |
|
Feb 11 |
comment |
MD5 implementation Ok, I am oficially stupid. Now I understand it. Thank you very much. It was so simple, yet I thought there was some sort of derivation along the way, thank you! |
|
Feb 11 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Feb 11 |
revised |
MD5 implementation edited body |
|
Feb 11 |
comment |
MD5 implementation There is no special reason. I will not use it for anything serious, I just wanted a simple cryptographic hash function to implement on an FPGA with the purpose to learn and MD5 seemed appropiate. Nevertheless, I may follow your advice (maybe SHA 256?). But anyway, I am still curious about this "discrepancy" |
|
Feb 11 |
asked | MD5 implementation |
