| bio | website | notyet;) |
|---|---|---|
| location | Peacedale, RI | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | 12 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 21 |
Electronics Engineer, Amateur Cryptographer with interests in designing real random and psuedorandom bit generators.
"Randomness is like a box of chocolates; you never know what you are going to get"
Forrest Gump Jr.
"You can't use mathematical means to create true randomness but you can use mathematical means to stretch a short truly random bitstream into a binary string of virtually infinite length that is indistinguishable from the uniform distribution, the distinguisher being a Universal Turing Machine". John Von Neumann Jr.
"It's trivial to make a Turing machine that fools all other Turing machines into "thinking" that they are looking at an unpredictable uniform distribution. Here is the schematic."
Alan Turing Jr.
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
Are asymptotic lower bounds relevant to cryptography? Hi Mike, I just re-read this paper again , read the last two paragraphs on page 704. Shannon never gives a mathematical proof for the security of the OTP, he only talks about the requirements of a perfect secrecy system. He shows that the OTP meets the requirements but he does not offer a mathematical proof (lower bound for the amount of work necessary to break a OTP cipher of length N) of security. Big difference, that is the P vs NP problem. |
|
Apr 24 |
comment |
Are asymptotic lower bounds relevant to cryptography? @Mikeazo: Hi Mike, did Shannon offer a mathematical proof that the OTP is unbreakable? Could you supply a reference to this, I guess this guy is looking for lower bounds for solving an NP problem (cryptosystem) which is of course equivalent to separating P and NP? |
|
Apr 24 |
answered | Are asymptotic lower bounds relevant to cryptography? |
|
Nov 29 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Nov 29 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Nov 28 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 16 |
comment |
Are there practical upper limits of RSA key lengths? @Samuel: Thank you for taking the time to run the numbers! |
|
Nov 16 |
revised |
Are there practical upper limits of RSA key lengths? correct word here is practical, not practically |
|
Nov 14 |
comment |
Are there practical upper limits of RSA key lengths? Thank you, I was thinking that primality testing would be difficult for such large primes. Can you recommend any literature that explores this avenue of research? |
|
Nov 14 |
comment |
Are there practical upper limits of RSA key lengths? Thank you for the reply, although I don't get the connection between scientific inquiry and demonstrations of manhood :) |
|
Nov 14 |
asked | Are there practical upper limits of RSA key lengths? |
|
Sep 18 |
comment |
Could one construct a cipher that is secure for friendly parties to use but insecure for hostile parties? I have to take issue with some of Mr. Ebermann's comments about the one time pad not being a stream cipher . I make these comments here for the sake of those who may be following this particular thread. I guess I will have to begin by asking Mr. Ebermann what his definition of a one time pad is and why the cipher system I have mentioned in this thread cannot be classified as a one time pad as is traditionally defined in the Wikipedia article on the one time pad. |
|
Sep 14 |
comment |
Could one construct a cipher that is secure for friendly parties to use but insecure for hostile parties? @Paulo: A "modern day" one time pad cipher uses a psuedorandom bit generator as the keystream. An m-sequence psuedorandom generator with a seed length(register length) of 100bits running at 1Ghz will generate bits for millions of years before it repeats its sequence. If I secretly send someone my 100bit key and he/she has the same crypt-decrypt algorithm as me, then we can communicate with each other with perfect secrecy at an information rate of 1 billion bits per second for millions of years using the one time pad cipher, one key bit for every bit of text. |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Could one construct a cipher that is secure for friendly parties to use but insecure for hostile parties? @e501: I can't recommend any articles off-hand, sorry, I am too busy, but I'm sure you can find lots of good stuff there! |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Could one construct a cipher that is secure for friendly parties to use but insecure for hostile parties? @Paulo: Every cryptography book I have ever read describes the one time pad as a stream cipher. Please enlighten us as to why you think it is not a stream cipher. |
|
Sep 12 |
answered | Could one construct a cipher that is secure for friendly parties to use but insecure for hostile parties? |
|
Aug 9 |
comment |
Why isn't the alternating step generator used more often? Thank you , very informative! |
|
Aug 7 |
comment |
Why isn't the alternating step generator used more often? Thank you for the patent link, when I first searched for this at USPTO I typed in CG Gunther and nothing came up, I should have dug deeper :) |
|
Aug 7 |
asked | Why isn't the alternating step generator used more often? |