| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | Nov 16 '11 at 21:41 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Oct 25 |
comment |
Is there a group of prime order which could fit the CT-Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption? Now I get it. Thanks. |
|
Oct 24 |
comment |
Is there a group of prime order which could fit the CT-Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption? Wow, awesome answer. Thanks! Would you mind explaining CT-CDH in terms of CDH? I understand the latter, but only vaguely understand the former. |
|
Oct 24 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Oct 24 |
accepted | Is there a group of prime order which could fit the CT-Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption? |
|
Oct 24 |
comment |
Is there a group of prime order which could fit the CT-Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption? Sorry, it says how $H_1$ is used in the paper. I don't think it's relevant for the assumption, though. The second paper I mentioned gives a definition without the hash function that is nearly identical. |
|
Oct 24 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 24 |
asked | Is there a group of prime order which could fit the CT-Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption? |