Timeline for Can I use Additive Secret Sharing without Finite Fields without introducing an exploitable bias?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2022 at 18:12 | vote | accept | Pedro Campones | ||
| Oct 19, 2022 at 18:04 | comment | added | Pedro Campones | Thank you for your answer, with regards to the penultimate paragraph, we could have that the share values were selected from an interval between [-1000 ... 1000], however we could impose no restrictions on their sum. That is, I could sum two shares resulting in a value over 1000, even tough each is smaller than a thousand. As a result the "last" share that settles the difference between $A$ and the remaining shares could have a value outside the boundaries which could leak something. However even this could be mitigated by offloading some of its "excess" to the other shares. | |
| Oct 18, 2022 at 20:22 | history | answered | poncho | CC BY-SA 4.0 |