Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 11, 2023 at 20:53 comment added Taylor R Campbell @poncho Citation 1 already has the security reduction of Adiantum to ChaCha12 and AES. I edited the answer to cite the specific theorem in the paper and to sketch concrete usage limits. Does that address your question?
Jan 11, 2023 at 20:51 history edited Taylor R Campbell CC BY-SA 4.0
Cite security claims.
Jan 11, 2023 at 18:58 comment added samuel-lucas6 @poncho Not sure any has been done. There's a proof in the paper. Sounds like it pretty much boils down as you say.
Jan 11, 2023 at 14:21 comment added poncho What public cryptanalysis has been done against Adiantum? Do you have a security proof reducing it to the strength of ChaCha/Poly1305/AES? If neither, why do you advocate it as being secure?
Jan 11, 2023 at 12:42 history edited Taylor R Campbell CC BY-SA 4.0
Add a note about the limited applicability of Adiantum.
Jan 11, 2023 at 12:35 comment added Taylor R Campbell @JanKanis My very rough guess is Adiantum probably achieves about half or a third the throughput of hardware AES-XTS on the same CPU (but still probably higher throughput than variable-time software AES-XTS), assuming reasonably vectorized ChaCha and Poly1305 software. I don't have measurements handy, though, and if I did they would probably be on different hardware from you, so don't quote me on that; I suggest you take some measurements yourself on the hardware and software of interest to you.
Jan 11, 2023 at 10:23 vote accept JanKanis
Jan 11, 2023 at 10:22 comment added JanKanis Great! This seems to be exactly what I was looking for. Being a wide-block cipher Adiantum offers even better security than AES-XTS. Do you have any idea how Adiantum compares performance-wise against hardware accelerated AES-XTS?
Jan 11, 2023 at 0:49 history edited Taylor R Campbell CC BY-SA 4.0
not orders of magnitude
Jan 11, 2023 at 0:41 history answered Taylor R Campbell CC BY-SA 4.0