Timeline for Is Triple DES still considered safe to use?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29 at 19:55 | history | edited | U. Bulle | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 174 characters in body
|
| Apr 29 at 15:42 | history | edited | U. Bulle | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 23 at 7:38 | comment | added | fgrieu♦ | AFAIK, the small block size (as exploited by Sweet32) indeed is the only actual operational weakness of 3DES (even with two rather than three independent keys) in circumstances where side-channel attacks are infeasible. In such circumstances, key recovery attacks are still impractical AFAIK, for they require so much memory and accesses. | |
| S Apr 20 at 18:44 | review | First answers | |||
| Apr 21 at 14:45 | |||||
| S Apr 20 at 18:44 | history | answered | U. Bulle | CC BY-SA 4.0 |