Timeline for Why not flip random bits of the encrypted message for additional security? (hybrid system)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12 at 15:06 | answer | added | garfunkel | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 12 at 7:48 | history | edited | H-a-y-K | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 227 characters in body
|
| Jun 12 at 7:47 | vote | accept | H-a-y-K | ||
| May 22 at 23:34 | answer | added | bmm6o | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 22 at 22:38 | answer | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 22 at 17:17 | comment | added | H-a-y-K | @MaartenBodewes wow, thanks for the reaction! Sorry for late reaction as I wasn't expecting comments so I wasn't checking this site. I actually deleted, because I realized this must be a special case of XOR encryption and that the downsides must be similar with the downsides of XOR. But yeah, I'm open to new insight! | |
| May 22 at 17:16 | history | undeleted | H-a-y-K | ||
| May 19 at 16:01 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | If you want I can give some insight about this deleted question in comments - there would be lots of reasons not to use this (deleted questions + comments are visible to trusted users and mods for some time). | |
| May 19 at 14:30 | history | deleted | H-a-y-K | via Vote | |
| May 19 at 14:29 | history | asked | H-a-y-K | CC BY-SA 4.0 |