Timeline for How bad is adler32 as a cryptographic hash?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30 at 12:58 | answer | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 30 at 12:43 | comment | added | guest | @MaartenBodewes thank you. I was, quite literally, unable to formulate it so well | |
| Jun 30 at 12:29 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | I've significantly shortened your question, and removed the sudden "username" from the second option, as that was the part you were explicitly trying to avoid and it seemed incongruous with the rest of the question. | |
| Jun 30 at 12:28 | history | edited | Maarten Bodewes♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 444 characters in body
|
| Jun 30 at 10:54 | comment | added | guest | @kelalaka my project would have just have them create new accounts | |
| Jun 30 at 10:52 | comment | added | kelalaka | adler32 is a checksum algorithm it is not hash for any cryptographic hash function. Also, note that if they do not remember they must remember their e-mail or any other information that is used to identify during registration. | |
| Jun 30 at 3:20 | history | edited | guest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Jun 30 at 2:51 | history | edited | guest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jun 30 at 2:50 | history | edited | guest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 30 at 2:49 | history | edited | guest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jun 30 at 2:48 | history | edited | guest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
help visualizing
|
| S Jun 30 at 2:36 | review | First questions | |||
| Jun 30 at 13:05 | |||||
| S Jun 30 at 2:36 | history | asked | guest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |