Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
e-sushi
  • 18.1k
  • 12
  • 85
  • 235

Have you considered using a one-time pad scheme if you really want plausible deniability.? Each bit of the plaintext is XORed with a bit from the secret random pad. 

Even without the correct random pad or key, the ciphertext can be decrypted to all possible messages of the given length.

Have you considered using a one-time pad scheme if you really want plausible deniability. Each bit of the plaintext is XORed with a bit from the secret random pad. Even without the correct random pad or key, the ciphertext can be decrypted to all possible messages of the given length.

Have you considered using a one-time pad scheme if you really want plausible deniability? Each bit of the plaintext is XORed with a bit from the secret random pad. 

Even without the correct random pad or key, the ciphertext can be decrypted to all possible messages of the given length.

Source Link
jingyang
  • 744
  • 3
  • 5

Have you considered using a one-time pad scheme if you really want plausible deniability. Each bit of the plaintext is XORed with a bit from the secret random pad. Even without the correct random pad or key, the ciphertext can be decrypted to all possible messages of the given length.