Timeline for Does re-iterate AES-128 with different keys gives any benefict?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2020 at 18:33 | history | edited | Maarten Bodewes♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 30 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Mar 25, 2014 at 4:37 | comment | added | Richie Frame | If you are going to do a double encryption, it is best to use different algorithms, and if possible different modes. For example, AES128-CTR(Twofish128-ECB(Plaintext,Key),Key,Nonce). This is extremely fast and allows "false length" outputs on the CTR wrap. | |
| Mar 24, 2014 at 16:39 | history | edited | e-sushi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed typos, removed a depreciated tag, added the “keys” tag.
|
| Feb 1, 2014 at 13:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCrypto/status/429608785578328064 | ||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 8:00 | vote | accept | AlexanderPD | ||
| Jan 29, 2014 at 17:58 | answer | added | mikeazo | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 16:43 | comment | added | CodesInChaos | It's weaker than AES-256 against generic attacks. There is a meet in the middle attack which can break it with cost 2^128 (not sure how applicable the attack is with realistic cost models). See Attacking 2DES efficiently. Search for DES meet-in-the-middle for several related question. | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 16:34 | history | edited | AlexanderPD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Jan 29, 2014 at 15:12 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 29, 2014 at 15:29 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2014 at 14:57 | history | asked | AlexanderPD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |