Timeline for Can you prove the existance of a PRG $G$ s.t. for each even $k$: $G(k)=G(k+1)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 5, 2014 at 8:49 | comment | added | K.G. | The Wikipedia page on cryptographically secure pseudo-random generators isn't a good reference, because it requires "backtracking resistance", which is non-standard. Also, the best definition of pseudo-random generator uses indistinguishability, not next-bit-unpredictability. The two notions are equivalent, of course, but the indistinguishability definition is best. | |
S Feb 4, 2014 at 17:50 | history | suggested | rath | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Texified. (+) was turned to \oplus, [| and |] were left as they were.
|
Feb 4, 2014 at 17:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 4, 2014 at 17:50 | |||||
Feb 4, 2014 at 14:02 | comment | added | Cryptographeur | @e-sushi; @Diagon: I was the other reviewer on this, and was very close to rejecting it. Since it was submitted as anon there was no way of knowing if it was a legitimate edit or not. In the end i decided to let it through since you could always rollback once logged in and it wouldn't loose you your writing if legitimate. | |
Feb 4, 2014 at 13:46 | comment | added | e-sushi | No, I'm not a moderator. Depending on gained reputation, community members can vote to confirm or ignore edits. Your edit showed up as anonymous, which can lead to edits being non-trusted and therefore voted to be ignored. Didn't want to step on your toes or anything... it's just that some new members forget to login. That's why I wrote "do us a favor and login". Maybe it might have sounded a bit harsh or cynical, but it wasn't - logging in really makes life easier for us all, so it is a favor. Anyway, just read your meta post and now understand. Hope things work for you soon. Btw: Welcome. ;) | |
Feb 4, 2014 at 7:54 | comment | added | Diagon | @e-sushi - perhaps you would like to take a look here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/218477/… If you are a moderator, perhaps you could have a bit more patience. Thanks. | |
Feb 4, 2014 at 7:51 | history | edited | Diagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1118 characters in body
|
S Feb 1, 2014 at 23:43 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I'm Diagon, adding some second thoughts.
|
Feb 1, 2014 at 22:43 | comment | added | e-sushi | Next time you edit any of your questions or answers, do us a favour and login first. I gave an OK this time, but generally… edits are bound to be rejected if you post them as "anonymous user". Just stating "I am Diagon" doesn't really help verifying it's actually you who is proposing an edit. As said: next time, login to Crypto.SE! | |
Feb 1, 2014 at 22:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 1, 2014 at 23:43 | |||||
Feb 1, 2014 at 19:33 | history | edited | Diagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Feb 1, 2014 at 19:28 | history | edited | e-sushi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
Feb 1, 2014 at 18:57 | review | First posts | |||
Feb 1, 2014 at 19:31 | |||||
Feb 1, 2014 at 18:50 | history | edited | Diagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 203 characters in body
|
Feb 1, 2014 at 18:41 | history | answered | Diagon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |