Timeline for in Bilinear pairings, what is the difference between Type 2 and Type 3?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2014 at 21:25 | comment | added | Subhayan | also, this paper is now a bit out of date.. it does not talk a lot about type 4 pairings, recent works of Chatterjee et al (2010), now make type 4 pairings very much accessible.. also, type 1 pairings now are not very efficient because of recent works of Zhang et al (2014) and Granger et al(2014). | |
| May 5, 2014 at 21:21 | comment | added | Subhayan | yes, of course, I agree... I have already read that (in fact, almost anyone beginning PBC starts here).. I was actually haveing a little trouble understanding why one might want to use homomorphisms .. now (thanks to DrLecter and your answers), i understand it trivially :) | |
| May 5, 2014 at 13:34 | comment | added | mikeazo | @Subhayan the paper talks about pairings yes, but there is relevant information in the paper about the differences in the types of pairings. This gives information on the uses of the homomorphisms (since some of the primary differences are the fact that the homomorphisms exist or do not exist). | |
| May 2, 2014 at 21:58 | comment | added | Subhayan | thanks, but this paper talks ABOUT pairings .. my questions asks the use of homomorphism. | |
| May 1, 2014 at 17:55 | history | answered | mikeazo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |