Timeline for Can 64-bit “PRINCEcore” practically be brute forced?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2014 at 2:48 | vote | accept | drdot | ||
| May 5, 2014 at 9:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCrypto/status/463242971857829888 | ||
| May 5, 2014 at 6:54 | answer | added | fgrieu♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 2, 2014 at 18:58 | history | edited | e-sushi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor list-style formatting fix (don’t forget the blank line between your “some clarifications” and the following list). Also added “reference-request” tag as that came up in the comments.
|
| May 2, 2014 at 18:49 | history | edited | drdot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 163 characters in body
|
| May 2, 2014 at 18:47 | comment | added | drdot | @e-sushi, thank you for the comment. Now I am getting familiar with the terminology here ;). Yes, I came across those references and there is one more here. I have not seen any attacks on PRINCEcore that is significantly faster than brute force. What is the effort required to do a brute force attack on PRINCEcore? I have seen people using rainbow tables to break DES(56-bit key) pretty fast. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 18:37 | history | edited | drdot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| May 2, 2014 at 17:57 | history | edited | e-sushi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added title of linked paper, tuned title of the question to be more *on-point*.
|
| May 2, 2014 at 17:53 | comment | added | e-sushi | @dannycrane Depends how exactly you define “secure”. As far as I know, full PRINCE has not been broken yet. Nevertheless, you might find this paper and this paper interesting. There’s more of that out there… which is why I asked what you’ve researched – as I don’t want to waste your time with stuff you might already be aware of. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 14:19 | comment | added | drdot | @CodesInChaos, Thank you for the comments. Is there any related references that I can take a look? | |
| May 2, 2014 at 14:17 | comment | added | drdot | @e-sushi, I am sorry. Could you elaborate a little bit? I am not trying to make a trivial case. I am just curious if that is still secure. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 14:09 | comment | added | e-sushi | Removed key-whitening… in that case, let me ask: “What research have you done?” | |
| May 2, 2014 at 14:06 | comment | added | CodesInChaos | Once you're over the initial development cost of custom hardware, this isn't very expensive. I think it's about as much work as mining a single bitcoin block at the current difficult. Or differently said, it would take the current bitcoin mining network only a few minutes. Should be 10k USD or something of that magnitude. | |
| May 2, 2014 at 13:47 | review | First posts | |||
| May 2, 2014 at 13:59 | |||||
| May 2, 2014 at 13:31 | history | asked | drdot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |