Timeline for How secure is AES-256?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2020 at 0:21 | comment | added | Evgeniy Berezovsky |
So at the drafting of AES, we doubt that they were .... Why "we"? For whom are you speaking. Who art thou?
|
|
| Sep 23, 2016 at 22:21 | comment | added | Paul Uszak | There is a fundamental flaw in your summary argument that (respectfully) shows a certain naivete. It would be in the NSA's interest if AES was broken so that they could eavesdrop on other government departments. Approving and recommending AES to as broad an audience as possible (friend or foe) is exactly what you'd do with a flawed security system. | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 22:17 | comment | added | cremefraiche | NSA no longer approves < AES256 for top secret data in Suite B. | |
| Apr 1, 2012 at 23:34 | history | edited | B-Con | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos
|
| Apr 1, 2012 at 21:00 | history | answered | B-Con | CC BY-SA 3.0 |