Timeline for What are advantages of using a HMAC over RSA with SHA-1 hashes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://crypto.stackexchange.com/ with https://crypto.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| S Apr 2, 2013 at 23:43 | history | edited | mikeazo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
small but important spelling mistake must -> much
|
| S Apr 2, 2013 at 23:43 | history | suggested | Maarten Bodewes♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
small but important spelling mistake must -> much
|
| Apr 2, 2013 at 23:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 2, 2013 at 23:43 | |||||
| Apr 2, 2013 at 23:42 | history | edited | mikeazo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 14 characters in body
|
| Apr 2, 2013 at 23:40 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | @OwenOrwell Sorry for the misunderstanding, that was about a typo in the answer, I'll edit it. | |
| Apr 2, 2013 at 18:11 | comment | added | Owen Orwell | @owlstead HMAC is much faster - RSA is a very slow algorithm | |
| Apr 22, 2012 at 20:44 | vote | accept | Shane | ||
| Apr 14, 2012 at 16:08 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | "Will probably be must"? What about "are much"? Smaller size is certainly true as well. This is a dumb question though, it all depends on the key management... | |
| Apr 13, 2012 at 16:12 | history | edited | mikeazo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2012 at 16:03 | history | edited | poncho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 13, 2012 at 16:02 | history | answered | mikeazo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |