Timeline for Design properties of the Rijndael finite field?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 at 16:53 | comment | added | Paŭlo Ebermann | I just looked in the book (The design of Rijndael), and the description of the SubBytes step (section 3.4.1, pages 34-37) doesn't contain much more information than what is in the specification linked (but said in more words). | |
| Nov 28, 2011 at 15:56 | history | edited | Paŭlo Ebermann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting
|
| Aug 2, 2011 at 21:23 | comment | added | Jeff Moser | I believe the designers picked the specific polynomial because it was the first irreducible one from the book they cited that met their criteria. Thus, they picked the first one to remove the doubt that it was special. | |
| Jul 28, 2011 at 14:45 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=46 by developer User.Id=7529 | |
| Jul 26, 2011 at 19:42 | history | answered | Thomas Pornin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |