Timeline for Why hash the message before signing it with RSA?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2017 at 8:46 | comment | added | SatA | He mixed signing and encryption. When signing you already have the message that was signed, hence data integrity is irrelevant in the context that he put it in. It is relevant for encryption, though when encrypting you do not hash of course.. | |
| Mar 26, 2016 at 18:43 | comment | added | Ulkoma | I find it hard to understand this answer and the down votes, it would be great if someone can explain it to me what KM Raghava meant and why the down votes | |
| May 27, 2015 at 18:28 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 27, 2015 at 23:22 | |||||
| May 27, 2015 at 10:08 | review | Late answers | |||
| May 27, 2015 at 20:28 | |||||
| May 27, 2015 at 9:53 | review | First posts | |||
| May 27, 2015 at 12:15 | |||||
| May 27, 2015 at 9:50 | history | answered | KM Raghava | CC BY-SA 3.0 |