Timeline for Does authenticated encryption add any protection to a signed digital envelope?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2015 at 4:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCrypto/status/616820028780998657 | ||
| Jul 2, 2015 at 18:18 | vote | accept | Sergio A. Figueroa | ||
| Jul 2, 2015 at 14:31 | comment | added | Sergio A. Figueroa | Being SK the session key, M the message, SE(K, M) the symmetric encryption of M with the key K, and AE(K, M) the asymmetric encryption of M with the key K, "that structure" would be C=AE(recipient public key, SK) || SE(SK, M). The final scheme would have the form C2=AE(recipient public key, SK)||SE(SK, M||sign(M))||sign(SE(SK, M||sign(M))) | |
| Jul 2, 2015 at 14:18 | history | edited | Sergio A. Figueroa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2015 at 10:30 | answer | added | geoff_h | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 18:22 | answer | added | Yehuda Lindell | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 15:32 | comment | added | user991 | Is "that structure" just the PK-encrypted-symmetric-key, or that together with $\hspace{1.78 in}$ the symmetrically encrypted plaintext? $\;$ | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 15:21 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 1, 2015 at 16:13 | |||||
| Jul 1, 2015 at 15:20 | history | asked | Sergio A. Figueroa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |