Timeline for Correctness of ideal protocol of MPC in presence of malicious adversary
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2015 at 13:31 | comment | added | user991 | @preethi : $\:$ How does that violate "the correctness property of MPC"? $\;\;\;\;$ | |
| Jul 16, 2015 at 13:16 | answer | added | mikeazo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 16, 2015 at 6:04 | comment | added | preethi | Assume honest majority.In example, malicious party send 0 instead of 5. In that case, trusted party computes the function using 0 as one of the input which results in wrong output.Trusted party sends the output(wrong) to honest party i.e., it violates the correctness property of MPC. | |
| Jul 15, 2015 at 11:43 | comment | added | mikeazo | Are you assuming honest majority? Also, what do you mean by modified inputs? For example, if the malicious party's input is $5$ and they instead send $0$? There isn't anything you can do in that case. | |
| Jul 15, 2015 at 9:59 | answer | added | user991 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 15, 2015 at 9:29 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 15, 2015 at 14:18 | |||||
| Jul 15, 2015 at 9:28 | history | asked | preethi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |