Skip to main content

Timeline for Adding dummy bytes to ciphertext

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 17, 2020 at 8:17 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Oct 18, 2015 at 16:06 comment added Maarten Bodewes No, not really. I don't think it is not very useful either way. Changing the encoding just muddles the algorithm for for no specific reason, changing the ciphertext itself makes more sense.
Oct 18, 2015 at 15:58 comment added Kroma @MaartenBodewes: Yes, you are right. Do you think it changes the relevance of the selected answer? (and thanks for the edits btw)
Oct 16, 2015 at 22:39 history edited Maarten Bodewes CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body; edited title
Oct 16, 2015 at 16:20 vote accept Kroma
Oct 15, 2015 at 21:28 comment added Maarten Bodewes That isn't really ciphertext you are changing, you are changing the base 64 encoding of the ciphertext.
Oct 15, 2015 at 21:27 answer added Maarten Bodewes timeline score: 1
Oct 15, 2015 at 13:44 comment added Kroma @RichieFrame: I came to the same conclusion, until proven wrong (maybe) :)
Oct 15, 2015 at 6:51 answer added otus timeline score: 0
Oct 15, 2015 at 6:31 history edited otus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 9 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Oct 14, 2015 at 21:51 comment added Richie Frame I would think placing the dummy values into the plaintext before encryption would be more effective, as it would diffuse throughout the block (at least in the case of a block cipher). Or perhaps a combination of the 2
Oct 14, 2015 at 11:26 vote accept Kroma
Oct 16, 2015 at 16:20
Oct 14, 2015 at 8:54 history edited Kroma CC BY-SA 3.0
added 303 characters in body
Oct 14, 2015 at 8:44 answer added Thomas timeline score: 3
Oct 14, 2015 at 8:37 review First posts
Oct 14, 2015 at 12:39
Oct 14, 2015 at 8:35 history asked Kroma CC BY-SA 3.0