Timeline for Can "Approximate Hashing" work in a Proof-of-Work context?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 at 10:27 | vote | accept | fgrieu♦ | ||
| Feb 15, 2016 at 8:58 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | The latter then, thought it was a bit curious. It would be interesting to know what the authors think of this. According to their own paper they didn't test their findings in the field, so if they made any miscalculations then those will be reflected in the conclusions. | |
| Feb 15, 2016 at 6:47 | history | edited | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Polish
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 6:20 | history | edited | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarify; emphasize the other update made.
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 6:15 | history | edited | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarify; emphasize the other update made.
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 6:05 | history | edited | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Update with considerations on power further lowering the potential gain, and a possible explanation of the low number of adders considered by the authors
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 5:39 | comment | added | fgrieu♦ | @Maarten Bodewes: I hit the thing reading Slashdot, wondered if that was believable, could not debunk the claim in half an hour, and asked the question with no precise argument against the claim. I have no connection (to my knowledge) or business/academic interest with that scientific paper, its authors, their institution, the subject, or bitcoin mining; the closest thing is that I had training on logic design decades ago, and vaguely remember Ripple Carry Adders versus Carry Lookhead Adders. | |
| Feb 14, 2016 at 23:20 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | Eh, did you just use this platform to attack the outcome of a scientific paper? Or did you really just find this out after asking the question? | |
| Feb 14, 2016 at 22:09 | history | edited | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add conclusion
|
| Feb 14, 2016 at 21:54 | history | edited | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Feb 14, 2016 at 21:45 | history | edited | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos
|
| Feb 14, 2016 at 21:37 | history | answered | fgrieu♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |