Skip to main content
added 19 characters in body
Source Link

The difference is that all known attacks on AES [but see comments] require in the neighborhood of 2length attempts to succeed; that is, there's no better method known than simply trying different keys by brute force.

It follows, then, that a 256 bit key is 2128 times as hard to crack as a 128 bit key.

Of course, computing each encrypted block with 256 bit keys is harder too.

The choice of key length should be based on risk: the damage that will be done if an attack is successful.

The difference is that all known attacks on AES require in the neighborhood of 2length attempts to succeed; that is, there's no better method known than simply trying different keys by brute force.

It follows, then, that a 256 bit key is 2128 times as hard to crack as a 128 bit key.

Of course, computing each encrypted block with 256 bit keys is harder too.

The choice of key length should be based on risk: the damage that will be done if an attack is successful.

The difference is that all known attacks on AES [but see comments] require in the neighborhood of 2length attempts to succeed; that is, there's no better method known than simply trying different keys by brute force.

It follows, then, that a 256 bit key is 2128 times as hard to crack as a 128 bit key.

Of course, computing each encrypted block with 256 bit keys is harder too.

The choice of key length should be based on risk: the damage that will be done if an attack is successful.

Source Link

The difference is that all known attacks on AES require in the neighborhood of 2length attempts to succeed; that is, there's no better method known than simply trying different keys by brute force.

It follows, then, that a 256 bit key is 2128 times as hard to crack as a 128 bit key.

Of course, computing each encrypted block with 256 bit keys is harder too.

The choice of key length should be based on risk: the damage that will be done if an attack is successful.