Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 21, 2022 at 23:55 comment added Sam Ginrich Think this question is not specific for RSA, nor for the security of textbook RSA or the encryption algorithm at all. It's a question of protocol and network topology. In any case, there is a time, when you decide to consider a message as authentic. Essential help is having two communication lines, which in the public area have no intersection, so an assumed "man in the middle" will miss at least one part of required messages of key exchange.
Jul 13, 2020 at 19:21 history edited puzzlepalace CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixed non-negligible to negligible.
Jul 13, 2020 at 8:09 comment added jvdh the adversary has negligible advantage, not non-negligible advantage
Dec 12, 2018 at 14:01 vote accept Sam
Dec 12, 2018 at 14:01
May 9, 2016 at 21:35 comment added puzzlepalace You are correct, answer has been edited.
May 9, 2016 at 21:35 history undeleted puzzlepalace
May 9, 2016 at 21:35 history edited puzzlepalace CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1004 characters in body
May 9, 2016 at 20:51 history deleted puzzlepalace via Vote
May 9, 2016 at 20:43 comment added SEJPM Please note: textbook RSA by itself is deterministic (if you use it in a traditional sense as $m^e\bmod N$), thus it cannot be IND-CPA (also see theorem 11.4 of Katz/Lindell's Introduction to modern cryptography 2nd edition). However, OAEP does include randomness and this is the crucial part for IND-CPA here.
May 9, 2016 at 20:17 history answered puzzlepalace CC BY-SA 3.0