Timeline for Is the statement true in the context of AES-256 encrypted data stored on a hacked server?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2016 at 21:12 | answer | added | Luis Casillas | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 9:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCrypto/status/808960709203787776 | ||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 18:04 | comment | added | Francky_V | It's been there for some time (part of an application). Unless we get to a point where it can be considered unsafe, I doubt it's possible to put it as a priority on the road map. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 18:02 | history | edited | Francky_V | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added reworded statement according to answer
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 18:01 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | Slightly off topic: why CFB? That's not a common mode of encryption (anymore). AEAD ciphers such as GCM & EAX are all the rage now... | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 17:48 | vote | accept | Francky_V | ||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 17:42 | history | edited | Biv | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
it is not about AES, it is about the usage. :)
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 17:41 | answer | added | Biv | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 17:05 | history | edited | e-sushi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 17:04 | history | reopened | e-sushi | ||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:59 | history | edited | Francky_V | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified the question
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:56 | history | closed | e-sushi | Needs details or clarity | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:54 | history | edited | e-sushi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:51 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:56 | |||||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:48 | history | asked | Francky_V | CC BY-SA 3.0 |