Skip to main content
fixed small errors/added tex
Source Link
Ella Rose
  • 19.9k
  • 6
  • 55
  • 103

In this regard SHA-1 despite it's weaknesses can be viewed as a pseudo random function. This meamsmeans we are are.frowing n throwing $n$ balls into n$n$ bins. An output bin remains empty if all the balls miss it. Which happens with probability (1-1/n)^n$(1-1/n)^n$ which is 1/e$1/e$ and that is the portion of output bins which are empty. We also can estimate that the most populated bin has aproxinately log(n)approximately $log(n)$ balls.

In this regard SHA-1 despite it's weaknesses can be viewed as a pseudo random function. This meams we are are.frowing n balls into n bins. An output bin remains empty if all the balls miss it. Which happens with probability (1-1/n)^n which is 1/e and that is the portion of output bins which are empty. We also can estimate that the most populated bin has aproxinately log(n) balls.

In this regard SHA-1 despite it's weaknesses can be viewed as a pseudo random function. This means we are are throwing $n$ balls into $n$ bins. An output bin remains empty if all the balls miss it. Which happens with probability $(1-1/n)^n$ which is $1/e$ and that is the portion of output bins which are empty. We also can estimate that the most populated bin has approximately $log(n)$ balls.

Source Link
Meir Maor
  • 12k
  • 1
  • 23
  • 54

In this regard SHA-1 despite it's weaknesses can be viewed as a pseudo random function. This meams we are are.frowing n balls into n bins. An output bin remains empty if all the balls miss it. Which happens with probability (1-1/n)^n which is 1/e and that is the portion of output bins which are empty. We also can estimate that the most populated bin has aproxinately log(n) balls.