Timeline for How Far Ahead of Academia Are Government Agencies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2017 at 17:18 | history | edited | b degnan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added links to clarify the esoteric semiconductor jargon.
|
| Aug 20, 2017 at 17:15 | comment | added | b degnan | @SamT Companies just push what they already sell. ARM is a good example, as if you read the NIST 8114 feedback on the upcoming lightweight crypto spec, they are completely daft to why someone wouldn't want to use an ARM in their system. (I never use ARMs as I have better cores for area/power/throughput and no IP burdens) Companies generally push specs around products that exist. Also, I'll add links to the above in an edit. | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 15:34 | comment | added | Sam OT | Interesting take, +1! To be honest, I don't understand what a lot of the stuff in your second paragraph means, but I get, and agree with, the general idea of academics being more idea-focused and governments being more towards applications. What do you think about comparing with technological companies who are also pushing for applications (to then become consumer products, albeit specialised)? | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 14:40 | history | answered | b degnan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |