Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 4, 2018 at 16:20 comment added Luigi2405 Of course it is fine ;)
Jul 4, 2018 at 15:43 comment added Geoffroy Couteau You are interested in "another theorem"? You explicitly stated that you are looking for a proof that no PKE can be unconditionally secure. Which is exactly an immediate corollary of Shannon's theorem about perfect secrecy (Cédric essentially re-proved Shannon's theorem for the specific case of public-key encryption in his (good) answer below). It seems to me that you were looking for an explanation of Shannon's theorem in the specific case of PKE, not for a formal proof of Shannon's theorem - or are we not talking about the same theorem of Shannon? Anyway, if you got your answer, it's fine :)
Jul 4, 2018 at 15:33 comment added Luigi2405 @GeoffroyCouteau 3 seconds? I've found it in just 2.. when I was looking for that. I'm interested in another theorem but luckly someone has understood me
Jul 4, 2018 at 13:13 answer added Cédric Van Rompay timeline score: 2
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:09 comment added Geoffroy Couteau Do you know of a formal proof of Shannon's theorem? (You can find that anywhere with 3s of research, it's probably on Wikipedia). A formal proof of this theorem will in particular be a formal proof that no PKE scheme is unconditionnally secure.
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:56 review Low quality posts
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:45
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:55 comment added Luigi2405 PKE schemes are not uncoditionally (or perfectly, or theoretically, or whatever you prefer) secure accroding to Shannon's Theorem. I'm looking for a formal proof
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:43 comment added mephisto Just think about an attack. It can be terribly costly and have negligible success probability. However, if you find such an attack that proves that the scheme is not information-theoretically secure. If you can figure out a generic attack that works for all PKE schemes you are done.
Jul 4, 2018 at 9:39 history asked Luigi2405 CC BY-SA 4.0