Timeline for Can public key cryptography survive quantum computers? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2020 at 8:42 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes♦ | Note that these kind of dupes are great end points for search engines to look up the dupes. As such they have a function of their own, even if other Q/A's are dupes. This would be lost when questions are merged; merging is hard if the questions are asked differently. | |
| Nov 4, 2020 at 8:38 | history | edited | Maarten Bodewes♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 6, 2020 at 20:37 | vote | accept | R1w | ||
| Sep 23, 2018 at 3:47 | history | duplicates list edited | e-sushi | duplicates list edited from How will Cryptography be changed by Quantum Computing?, What does a "real" quantum computer need for cryptanalysis and/or cryptographic attack purposes?, Can quantum computers put computer security in jeopardy?, What is post Quantum Cryptography? to How will Cryptography be changed by Quantum Computing?, What does a "real" quantum computer need for cryptanalysis and/or cryptographic attack purposes?, What is post Quantum Cryptography? | |
| Sep 15, 2018 at 14:19 | vote | accept | R1w | ||
| Aug 6, 2020 at 20:37 | |||||
| Sep 14, 2018 at 20:13 | history | duplicates list edited | e-sushi | duplicates list edited from How will Cryptography be changed by Quantum Computing?, Can quantum computers put computer security in jeopardy?, What is post Quantum Cryptography? to How will Cryptography be changed by Quantum Computing?, What does a "real" quantum computer need for cryptanalysis and/or cryptographic attack purposes?, Can quantum computers put computer security in jeopardy?, What is post Quantum Cryptography? | |
| Sep 14, 2018 at 20:09 | history | closed |
fgrieu♦ Ilmari Karonen Ella Rose e-sushi |
Duplicate of How will Cryptography be changed by Quantum Computing?, Can quantum computers put computer security in jeopardy?, What is post Quantum Cryptography? | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 10:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 14, 2018 at 20:09 | |||||
| S Sep 11, 2018 at 10:08 | history | suggested | R1w |
tag changed
|
|
| Sep 11, 2018 at 10:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 11, 2018 at 10:08 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2018 at 10:03 | answer | added | Meir Maor | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 10:00 | history | edited | R1w | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 11, 2018 at 9:59 | comment | added | forest | @fgrieu You're right. I should have said that current public key cryptography will not survive. | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 9:58 | answer | added | AleksanderCH | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 9:56 | comment | added | fgrieu♦ | @forest: Your summary is way too radical for me. While RSA, and Discrete-Logarithm-based ECC public key cryptographic schemes (including ECDH, ECDSA, EdDSA) would not survive large general-purpose quantum computers, 1) such computers are hypothetical, thus these schemes might well turn out to survive all quantum computers that humanity will build 2) other public-key cryptographic schemes (including some ECC-based, e.g. SIKE), are conjectured to resist even hypothetical large general-purpose quantum computers. | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 9:37 | history | edited | R1w | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 11, 2018 at 9:34 | comment | added | forest | I believe this has been answered in various questions here already. The gist of the answer is that public key cryptography like RSA and ECC will not survive, whereas symmetric cryptography like AES and SHA-256 will survive simply by doubling their key lengths. | |
| S Sep 11, 2018 at 9:25 | history | suggested | AleksanderCH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected spelling & grammar and added tags
|
| Sep 11, 2018 at 9:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 11, 2018 at 9:25 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2018 at 9:20 | history | asked | R1w | CC BY-SA 4.0 |