Timeline for Algorithm complexity: $\mathcal O(n\cdot m)$ vs. $\mathcal O(max(n,m)^2)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 8, 2018 at 15:22 | answer | added | kelalaka | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 8, 2018 at 15:20 | comment | added | SEJPM | Actually $\mathcal O(n\cdot m)$ denotes "complexity is at most linear in $n$ and $m$" and thus I'd say $\mathcal O(n\cdot m)$ is much easier to understand and actually a better bound than $\mathcal O(\max(n,m)^2)$, because the latter tells you "if we fix $n$ and increase $m$ linearly, work wil increase quadratically" whereas the former will say that the work will grow linearly. | |
Nov 8, 2018 at 12:17 | history | edited | Alpha Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2018 at 12:12 | history | edited | Alpha Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2018 at 12:01 | history | edited | Alpha Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 663 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2018 at 10:36 | history | edited | Alpha Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body; edited title
|
Nov 8, 2018 at 10:24 | comment | added | kelalaka |
The some efficient computation that is the only part belongs to secuirty parameter $k$.
|
|
Nov 8, 2018 at 10:23 | history | edited | Alpha Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2018 at 9:58 | history | asked | Alpha Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |