Skip to main content
added 56 characters in body
Source Link
ckamath
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 24
  • 42

Any language in the classes PZK (perfect zero-knowledge), SZK (statistical zero-knowledge) or CZK (computational zero-knowledge) have interactive protocols that are zero knowledge and don't require a CRS. Some of the interesting non-trivial languages in these classes are listed below. (I'd also recommend this beautiful survey by Vadhan)

However, Oren [O] showed that only languages in BPP have NIZK proofs without CRS. You can find a proof sketch here (Lemma 1).

[O]: Oren. On the cunning power of cheating verifiers: Some observations about zero knowledge proofs (behind a paywall unfortunately).

Any language in the classes PZK (perfect zero-knowledge), SZK (statistical zero-knowledge) or CZK (computational zero-knowledge) have interactive protocols that are zero knowledge and don't require a CRS. Some of the interesting non-trivial languages in these classes are listed below. (I'd also recommend this beautiful survey by Vadhan)

However, Oren [O] showed that only languages in BPP have NIZK proofs without CRS. You can find a proof sketch here (Lemma 1).

[O]: Oren. On the cunning power of cheating verifiers: Some observations about zero knowledge proofs (behind a paywall unfortunately).

Any language in the classes PZK (perfect zero-knowledge), SZK (statistical zero-knowledge) or CZK (computational zero-knowledge) have interactive protocols that are zero knowledge and don't require a CRS. Some of the interesting non-trivial languages in these classes are listed below. (I'd also recommend this beautiful survey by Vadhan)

However, Oren [O] showed that only languages in BPP have NIZK proofs without CRS. You can find a proof sketch here (Lemma 1).

[O]: Oren. On the cunning power of cheating verifiers: Some observations about zero knowledge proofs (behind a paywall unfortunately).

added 91 characters in body
Source Link
ckamath
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 24
  • 42

Any language in the classesclasses PZK (perfect zero-knowledge), SZK (statistical zero-knowledge) or CZK (computational zero-knowledge) have interactive protocols that are zero knowledge and don't require a CRS. Some of the interesting non-trivial languages in these classes are listed below. (I'd also recommend this beautiful survey by Vadhan)

However, Oren [O] showed that only languages in BPP have NIZK proofs without CRS. You can find a proof sketch here (Lemma 1).

[O]: Oren. On the cunning power of cheating verifiers: Some observations about zero knowledge proofs (behind a paywall unfortunately).

Any language in the classes PZK (perfect zero-knowledge), SZK (statistical zero-knowledge) or CZK (computational zero-knowledge) have interactive protocols that are zero knowledge and don't require a CRS. Some of the interesting non-trivial languages in these classes are listed below. (I'd also recommend this beautiful survey by Vadhan)

However, Oren [O] showed that only languages in BPP have NIZK proofs without CRS. You can find a proof sketch here (Lemma 1).

[O]: Oren. On the cunning power of cheating verifiers: Some observations about zero knowledge proofs (behind a paywall unfortunately).

Any language in the classes PZK (perfect zero-knowledge), SZK (statistical zero-knowledge) or CZK (computational zero-knowledge) have interactive protocols that are zero knowledge and don't require a CRS. Some of the interesting non-trivial languages in these classes are listed below. (I'd also recommend this beautiful survey by Vadhan)

However, Oren [O] showed that only languages in BPP have NIZK proofs without CRS. You can find a proof sketch here (Lemma 1).

[O]: Oren. On the cunning power of cheating verifiers: Some observations about zero knowledge proofs (behind a paywall unfortunately).

Source Link
ckamath
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 24
  • 42

Any language in the classes PZK (perfect zero-knowledge), SZK (statistical zero-knowledge) or CZK (computational zero-knowledge) have interactive protocols that are zero knowledge and don't require a CRS. Some of the interesting non-trivial languages in these classes are listed below. (I'd also recommend this beautiful survey by Vadhan)

However, Oren [O] showed that only languages in BPP have NIZK proofs without CRS. You can find a proof sketch here (Lemma 1).

[O]: Oren. On the cunning power of cheating verifiers: Some observations about zero knowledge proofs (behind a paywall unfortunately).